Marijuana and ADD
Therapeutic uses of Medical Marijuana
in the treatment of Attention Deficit Disorder
Kort E Patterson
It was mentioned in the Portland newspaper that the Oregon Health Division is
considering allowing medical marijuana to be used to treat Attention Deficit Disorder
(ADD) under the Oregon Medical Marijuana Act. At first glance it might seem counter-intuitive
to use a medication that has a public perception of decreasing attention to treat
a condition whose primary symptom is a deficit of attention. But just as taking stimulants
often calms those with hyperactivity, medical marijuana improves the ability to concentrate
in some types of ADD.
Categorizing The Condition
Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) is a very broad category of conditions that share
some symptoms but appear to result from different underlying causes. Most seem to
involve, at least in part, imbalances in neural transmitter levels and functions.
Some experts in the field expect that the broad category of ADD will be refined in
the future, with many conditions that are now diagnosed as ADD being recognized as
separate disorders.
The particular type of ADD under consideration for treatment with medical marijuana
might better be termed "Racing Brain Syndrome" (RBS). A useful analogy
for this mental condition is that of a centrifugal pump that is being over-driven.
As the pump speed increases, cavitation sets in and the pump's output decreases.
The faster the pump is driven the greater the cavitation until a point is reached
where large amounts of energy are being input but nothing is being output. Without
medication there is a sensation that thoughts flash through the brain too fast to
"think" them. Medical marijuana slows the brain down sufficiently to achieve
impressive improvements in functionality.
This syndrome probably only afflicts a small minority of all those diagnosed with
ADD. The condition doesn't respond to the standard ADD medications, indicating that
it results from different underlying processes than other forms of ADD. Individuals
with types of ADD that do respond to the standard ADD medications also tend to have
a far different reaction to medical marijuana than those with RBS. At this point
in our limited understanding of the condition, it appears that RBS would make a good
candidate to be redefined as a separate condition outside of the general diagnosis
of ADD.
Treating ADD/RBS With Medical Marijuana
There is some evidence available that medical marijuana has been found to be an
effective medication for some types of ADD by other researchers in the field.(1)
Unfortunately, ADD encompasses such a variety of conditions that the limited amount
of research in the field leaves many of the effective therapeutic mechanisms under-investigated.
Considering the regulatory difficulties in researching the effects of medical marijuana,
it isn't surprising that the information regarding medical marijuana and ADD is largely
anecdotal(2).
Individuals with RBS tend to have a very low tolerance for most stimulants, and
report even caffeine aggravates their disorder. The one exception appears to be low
doses of Dextrostat. While Dextrostat does have a calming effect, it fails to address
the higher level mental functions needed for complex intellectual demands. Larger
doses of Dextrostat tend to produce undesirable mental and physical stimulation,
greatly limiting the level of medication that can be tolerated.
Medical marijuana remains the only single medication that provides an adequate
solution for RBS, and remains a necessary component in a multi-drug approach.
Dextrostat does appear to reduce the amount of medical marijuana needed by individuals
with RBS to achieve a functional mental state. This reduction probably justifies
continuing with Dextrostat as a means of reducing the quantity of medical marijuana
that must consumed, as well as allow those with RBS to gain the maximum benefit possible
within the quantity limitations of the OMMA.
The green leaves of certain strains of medical marijuana appear to provide the
best therapeutic effects for RBS. Experiments with Marinol seem to indicate that
THC is involved, but is not the primary therapeutic agent. The therapeutic agent(s)
most useful in treating RBS appear to be present in relatively low concentrations
in medical marijuana. As such those with this condition must consume a larger quantity
of medical marijuana in order to ingest a sufficient dosage of the target agent(s).
This would explain why dried low-THC green leaves appear to be the most effective
treatment. The patient can consume enough of this low-THC marijuana to acquire the
levels of the needed active agent(s) necessary to treat the condition without in
the process consuming sufficient THC to become intoxicated.
Underlying Cause of RBS
It has long been suspected that RBS involved a deficit of one or more neural transmitters.
It was observed as long ago as the 1970's that high levels of adrenaline had a residual
therapeutic effect in those with RBS. The effect was first noted in those engaged
in such activities as skydiving. Individuals with RBS reported that their mental
functions were improved in the days following skydiving. It was first assumed that
adrenaline stimulated the production of all neural transmitters - including those
that were in deficit. It's now thought that while adrenaline initially acts as a
stimulant of neural transmitter production, it has a secondary effect of depleting
neural transmitters. The limited effectiveness of Dextrostat, as well as additional
information about the secondary effects of adrenaline, suggests the possibility that
at least part of the underlying cause of RBS may also be a surplus of one or more
neural transmitters.
The partial solution offered by Dextrostat also suggests that at least some part
of the condition results from those neural transmitters and/or hormones that are
influenced by both Dextrostat and medical marijuana. The failure of Dextrostat to
provide a complete solution suggests two possible alternatives: (1) that the effects
of Dextrostat and medical marijuana are additive - with both influencing the same
neural transmitters and/or hormones, and together delivering the required level of
therapeutic effect; or (2) that the condition is the result of multiple imbalances,
some of which are unaffected by Dextrostat, but all of which appear to be affected
by medical marijuana.
Potential Beneficial Therapeutic Effects
The research that has been done on the therapeutic effects of medical marijuana
on other conditions provides a number of potential mechanisms that may be involved
in RBS. The following are documented effects of medical marijuana that appear to
have some potential for involvement.
Perhaps the most obvious possibility is suggested by the fact that both Dextrostat
and medical marijuana influence the release and/or functions of serotonin(3)(4).
Since both Dextrostat and medical marijuana appear to increase the apparent availability
and effectiveness of serotonin, it would appear possible that a deficit of serotonin
is involved in some way.
There are over 60 cannabinoids and cannabidiols present in medical marijuana.
The effect of most of these substances is at present largely unknown.(5)
The discovery of a previously unknown system of cannabinoid neural transmitters
is profound.(6) The different cannabinoid receptor types found in the body appear
to play different roles in normal human physiology.(5) An endogenous cannabinoid,
arachidonylethanolamide, named anandamide, has been found in the human brain. This
ligand inhibits cyclic AMP in its target cells, which are widespread throughout the
brain, but demonstrate a predilection for areas involved with nociception. The exact
physiological role of anandamide is unclear, but preliminary tests of its behavioral
effects reveal actions similar to those of THC.(7)
Cannabinoid receptors appear to be very dense in the globus pallidus, substantia
nigra pars reticulata (SNr), the molecular layers of the cerebellum and hippocampal
dentate gyrus, the cerebral cortex, other parts of the hippocampal formation, and
striatum - with the highest density being in the SNr. The Neocortex has moderate
receptor density, with peaks in superficial and deep layers. Very low and homogeneous
density was found in the thalamus and most of the brainstem, including all of the
monoamine containing cell groups, reticular formation, primary sensory, visceromotor
and cranial motor nuclei, and the area postrema. The hypothalamus, basal amygdala,
central gray, nucleus of the solitary tract, and laminae I-III and X of the spinal
cord showed slightly higher but still sparse receptor density.(5)
While there are cannabinoid receptors in the ventromedial striatum and basal ganglia,
which are areas associated with dopamine production, no cannabinoid receptors have
been found in dopamine-producing neurons. According to the congressional Office of
Technology Assessment, research over the last 10 years has proved that marijuana
has no effect on dopamine-related brain systems.(6) However, cannabidiol has been
shown to exert anticonvulsant and antianxiety properties, and is suspected by some
to exert antidyskinetic effects through modulation of striatal dopaminergic activity.(3)
It's been suggested that the cannabinoid receptors in the human brain play a role
in the limbic system, which in turn plays a central role in the mechanisms which
govern behavior and emotions. The limbic system coordinates activities between the
visceral base-brain and the rest of the nervous system. Cannabis acts on memory by
way of the receptors in the limbic system's hippocampus, which "gates"
information during memory consolidation.(6)
In addition, some effects of cannabinoids appear to be independent of cannabinoid
receptors. The variety of mechanisms through which cannabinoids can influence human
physiology underlies the variety of potential therapeutic uses for medical marijuana.(8)
When the effects of cannabis on a "normal" brain are tracked on an electroencephalogram
(EEG), there is an initial speeding up of brain wave activity and a reactive slowing
as the drug effects wear off. The higher the dosage, the more intense the effects
and longer the experience. There is an increase in mean-square alpha energy levels
and a slight slowing of alpha frequency.(5) There is also an increase of beta waves
reflecting increased cognitive activity. The distortion of time resulting from the
"speeding up of thoughts" causes a subjective perception that there is
a slowing of time.(9)
As the cannabis effects wear off, stimulation gives way to sedation. The cognitive
activity of the beta state gives way to alpha and theta frequencies. Theta waves
are commonly associated with visual imagery. These images interact with thinking
and disrupt the train of thought. Thinking can be distracted by these intrusions,
with thought contents being modified to some extent depending on dose, expectations,
setting, and personality.(9)
Cannabis decreases emotional reactivity and intensity of affect while increasing
introspection as evidenced by the slowing of the EEG after initial stimulation. Obsessive
and pressured thinking is replaced by introspective free associations. Emotional
reactivity is moderated and worries become less pressing.(10)
Cannabis causes a general increase in cerebral blood flow (CBF). This increase
in blood circulation is due to decreased peripheral resistance, which is in turn
due to the dilation of the capillaries in the cerebral cortex. Changes in CBF affect
the mental processes of the brain, with increases stimulating cognition, while decreases
accompany sedation.(9)
Relative Safety of Medical Marijuana
"Marijuana is the safest therapeutically active substance known to man...
safer than many foods we commonly consume." DEA Judge Francis L. Young, Sept.
6, 1988
"After carefully monitoring the literature for more than two decades, we
have concluded that the only well-confirmed deleterious physical effect of marihuana
is harm to the pulmonary system." Grinspoon M.D., James B. Bakalar,
Medical Marijuana has been in use for thousands of years, and in spite of substantial
efforts to find adverse effects, it remains the safest medication available for RBS.
There has never been a single known case of lethal overdose. The ratio of lethal
to effective dose for medical marijuana is estimated to be as 40,000 to 1. By comparison,
the ratio is 3-50 to 1 for secobarbital and 4-10 to 1 for alcohol.(11)
During the 1890s the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission interviewed some eight hundred
people and produced a report of more than 3000 pages. The report concluded that "there
was no evidence that moderate use of cannabis drugs produced any disease or mental
or moral damage, or that it tended to lead to excess any more than the moderate use
of whiskey."(12)
The Mayor's Committee on Marihuana examined chronic users in New York City who
had averaged seven marihuana cigarettes a day for eight years and "showed no
mental or physical decline."(13) Several later controlled studies of chronic
heavy use failed to establish any pharmacologically induced harm.(14) A subsequent
government sponsored review of cannabis conducted by the Institute of Medicine, a
branch of the National Academy of Sciences, also found little evidence of its alleged
harmfulness.(15) Several studies in the United States found that fairly heavy marihuana
use had no effects on learning, perception, or motivation over periods as long as
a year.(16)
Studies of very heavy smokers in Jamaica, Costa Rica, and Greece "found no
evidence of intellectual or neurological damage, no changes in personality, and no
loss of the will to work or participate in society."(17) The Costa Rican study
showed no difference between heavy users (seven or more marihuana cigarettes a day)
and lighter users (six or fewer cigarettes a day).(18) In addition, none of the studies
involving prolonged and heavy use of medical marijuana have shown any effects on
mental abilities suggestive of impairment of brain or cerebral function and cognition.(2)
The inhalation of the combustion products of burning plant material is the cause
of the only well-confirmed deleterious physical effects of medical marijuana. These
adverse effects can be eliminated by using one of the non-combustion means of ingesting
the mediation. Marijuana can be eaten in foods or inhaled using a vaporizer. The
therapeutic agents in medical marijuana vaporize at around 190 degrees centigrade,
while it takes the heat of combustion of around 560 degrees centigrade to generate
the harmful components of marijuana smoke. A vaporizer heats the medical marijuana
to the point where the therapeutic agents are released and can be inhaled, without
getting the plant material hot enough to burn.(19)
References:
1. Possible Therapeutic Cannabis Applications for Psychiatric Disorders, Tod H.
Mikuriya, M.D.
2. Marihuana, The Forbidden Medicine, Lester Grinspoon M.D., James B. Bakalar,
Yale University Press, 1997
3. MARIJUANA AND TOURETTE'S SYNDROME, Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology,
Vol. 8/No. 6, Dec 1988
4. CANNABINOIDS BLOCK RELEASE OF SEROTONIN FROM PLATELETS INDUCED BY PLASMA FROM
MIGRAINE PATIENTS, Int J Clin Pharm. Res V (4) 243-246 (1985), Volfe Z., Dvilansky
A., Nathan I. Blood Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Soroka Medical Center,
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 151, Beer-Sheva 84101, Israel.
5. Nelson, P. L. (1993). A critical review of the research literature concerning
some biological and psychological effects of cannabis. In Advisory Committee on Illicit
Drugs (Eds.), Cannabis and the law in Queensland: A discussion paper (pp. 113-152).
Brisbane: Criminal Justice Commission of Queensland.
6. Marijuana And the Brain, by John Gettman, High Times, March, 1995
7. Cannabis for Migraine Treatment: The Once and Future Prescription?: An Historical
and Scientific Review; Ethan B. Russo, M.D.
8. Marijuana and Medicine, Assessing the Science Base, Janet E. Joy, Stanley J.
Watson, Jr., and John A. Benson, Jr., Editors Division of Neuroscience and Behavioral
Health, INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE
9. Marijuana Medical Handbook, by Tod Mikuriya, M.D.
10. Medicinal Uses of Cannabis, Tod H. Mikuriya, M.D. (c)1998
11. Marihuana as Medicine: A Plea for Reconsideration; Lester Grinspoon M.D.,
James B. Bakalar; Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA); June 1995
12. Report of the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission, 1893-1894, 7 vols. (Simla: Government
Central Printing Office, 1894); D. Solomon, ed., The Marihuana Papers (Indianapolis:
Bobbs-Merrill, 1966).
13. Mayor's Committee on Marihuana, The Marihuana Problem in the City of New York
(Lancaster, Pa.: Jacques Cattell, 1944).
14. M. H. Beaubrun and F Knight, "Psychiatric Assessment of Thirty Chronic
Users of Cannabis and Thirty Matched Controls," American journal of Psychiatry
130 (1973): 309; M. C. Braude and S. Szara, eds., The Pharmacology of Marihuana,
2 vols. (New York: Raven, 1976); R. L. Dombush, A. M. Freedman, and M. Fink, eds.,
"Chronic Cannabis Use," Annals of New Yorh Academy of Sciences 282 (1976);
J. S. Hochman and N. Q. Brill, "Chronic Marijuana Use and Psychosocial Adaptation,"
American journal of Psychiatry 130 (1973):132; Rubin and Comitas, Ganja in Jamaica.
15. Institute of Medicine, Marijuana and Health (Washington, D.C.: National Academy
of Sciences, 1982).
16. C. M. Culver and F W King, "Neurophysiological Assessment of Undergraduate
Marihuana and LSD Users," Archives of General Psychiatry 31 (1974): 707-711;
P.J. Lessin and S. Thomas, "Assessment of the Chronic Effects of Marijuana on
Motivation and Achievement: A Preliminary Report," in Pharmacology of Marihuana,
ed. Braude and Szara, 2:681-684.
17. Cognition and Long-Term Use of Ganja (Cannabis), Reprint Series, 24 July 1981,
Volume 213, pp. 465-466 SCIENCE, Jeffrey Schaeffer, Therese Andrysiak, and J. Thomas
Ungerleider Copyright 1981 by the American Association for the Advancement of Science
18. Rubin and Comitas, Ganja in Jamaica; W E. Carter, ed., Cannabis in Costa Rica:
A Study of Chronic Marihuana Use (Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human
Issues, 1980); C. Stefariis, J. Boulougouris, and A. I-iakos, "Clinical and
Psychophysiological Effects of Cannabis in Long-term Users," in Pharmacology
of Marihuana, ed. Braude and Szara, 2:659-666; P Satz, J. M. Fletcher, and L. S.
Sutker, "Neurophysiologic, Intellectual, and Personality Correlates of Chronic
Marihuana Use in Native Costa Ricans," Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
282 (1976): 266-306.
19. Is Marijuana The Right Medicine For You?; Bill Zimmerman Ph.D., Rick Bayer
M.D., and Nancy Crumpacker M.D.; (1998): pp. 125; Keats Publishing Inc.
 |